Family | Friends | Blogging | Books | Newspapers | Travel | Go | Music | Food |
"I cannot live without books." Thomas Jefferson
These lists are only partial; I have been erratic about keeping them, and even more erratic about writing actual reviews. I suspect this is somewhere over half of the books I have read in the last decade. In some years, when I had a long commute by car, I read/listened to books on tape/CD more than in actual print. I always prefer unabridged, but can't always get them.
This list partly pre-dates and was partly inspired by Ted's Bell, Book, and Candle.
The book starts at the Matewan Massacre, in which the mayor of Matewan, two miners, and seven Baldwin-Felts agents died, on May 19, 1920, then works its way backwards and forwards to the Blair Mountain incident in September, 1921, in which 10,000 angry miners (called "rednecks" for the red bandannas they wore) marched on Logan, where they were intent on lynching Don Chafin, the coal-company-bought-and-paid-for sheriff of Logan County.
The author is a former correspondent for Newsweek and the L.A. Times, and has written numerous books, but I was disappointed in the writing. The prose is pedestrian, sometimes almost high-schoolish. The flow of the book could have used some work; it reads more like a first draft than a finished book. My copy is a galley, uncorrected proof (courtesy of Bobo), and there are lots of copy-editing problems, which perhaps contributed to my impression, but that's not my real complaint.
Shogan is a pro-labor guy, and doesn't hide his feelings, but the book is ultimately pessimistic in tone, not favorable toward the individuals or the labor movement as a whole and its leverage in the 20th or 21st century.
The novel is famous for a couple of reasons: one, it's a real page-turner - I stayed up too late a couple of nights to finish it; two, lots of the history of the church and secret societies and Jesus himself that shows up in the book has resulted in a huge furor. Lots of it is fictional, which is fine by me, but don't take it too seriously or try to quote history from this book! (Even random facts such as the mileage of a Smart Car are wrong; no car in existence gets 100km to the liter! It really gets about a quarter of that, or less. I also suspect the writer meant to refer to the "turbid" waters of the Seine rather than the "turgid" waters, but that could be someone else's fault.)
I enjoyed the puzzles in the book, solving a couple and not solving several before they were revealed. The action is compelling, though the plot is implausible at many junctures and the writing of character and dialog is sometimes weak. If you've read or seen "Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade," Cryptonomicon, and "Eyes Wide Shut," parts of this will feel familiar, perhaps even derivative. The narrative is quite linear; I was surprised, given the topic, that we don't hop back and forth in time. Everything we learn about the past comes from the mouths of the historian/symbologist characters.
Dean's campaign was largely driven by grassroots folks (many of them unhappy about the war in Iraq, and equally unhappy that most mainstream Democrats wouldn't show enough spine to stand up to Bush) who organized themselves. The formal campaign didn't even realize that a lot of it was going on. Trippi is a technology consultant in the real world, and so helped push both Dean and the other campaign staff to ride the wave of support, helping to enable it and embracing the Internet, using ideas from supporters, not censoring their comments, and more - not just taking their money.
Trippi believes that the Internet provides a great means for empowering people, getting information to them, helping them meet each other, helping them keep their leaders accountable - it almost turns our country back into a village. That much, I agree with. But, Trippi seems to think it will inevitably result in a stronger democracy and more liberal government.
In my opinion, the Internet is more value-neutral. It's just as powerful a tool for conservatives as for liberals, for liars as well as for saints. We saw with the fall of the Soviet Union how the fax machine could be used to combat authoritarianism. With the Internet, people mostly seek out other people and sources of information that already match their existing biases. In that sense, it's an extension of top-down broadcast media. Websites documenting the negative side of the war in Iraq are pooh-poohed, ignored, whitewashed, or vilified by those on the other side. Few people actually look at information from both sides of a story, and the Internet is a perpetual-motion spin machine. You can use the Internet to, oh, say, track the movements of an army in an actual coup, but you can't use it to convince your neighbor to take the Bush-Cheney sign out of his front yard, at least not in the time frame of a single presidential election.
The book is highly recommended for anyone interested in how politics really works, or in the societal impact of technology.
Home | Personal | Current Research | Publications | History (c.v.) | Quotes | Contact me |